Technical diligence
Check what a company’s documents say about its systems against what its other records show.
Input, workflow, and limits →A product by Assertion Labs · In development
Connected intelligence. Inspectable evidence.
CliqueMap is being built to bring documents, entities, and claims into one investigation. Explore how things relate, trace each conclusion to its sources, and see what is still uncertain.
CliqueMap is in development. There are no accounts or hosted access yet. Pilots are scoped by conversation.
Synthetic example
Q1 · Can the report worker read customer records?
Source assertion The report worker reads only from billing-exports and has no access to customer-records.
SupportsSRC-2 Architecture overview v3 · 2026-03-02 · §4.2
The report worker runs as svc-report-worker. It reads only from the billing-exports queue and has no access to the customer-records store.
ConflictsSRC-3 Access policy rev 17 · captured 2026-04-15 · /Statement/1
{ "Sid": "TemporaryBackfill", "Effect": "Allow", "Action": "store:Read", "Resource": "store/customer-records/*", "Condition": { "DateLessThan": { "now": "2026-06-30T00:00:00Z" } } }OpenRevision 18 is not in the corpus. The fix is stated, not observed.
How it works
- 1
Bring the sources
Add the documents and records you are permitted to review. Each version keeps its date and where every excerpt came from.
- 2
Map entities and claims
See the systems, organizations, and statements involved. Each connection is a claim, linked to the passages that support or contradict it.
- 3
Review and brief
Record interpretations with their review state, keep open items visible, and export a brief that cites its sources.
The goal is fewer unsupported conclusions and reasoning you can inspect. That is the intent of the design, not a measured result.
Where we are starting
AI and security architecture review
Trace access boundaries, data flows, and model integrations to the documents that describe them.
Input, workflow, and limits →Research and R&D evidence analysis
Keep track of which papers, results, and notes support a technical position, and which cut against it.
Input, workflow, and limits →What exists today
This website and its synthetic walkthrough exist today. The capabilities below are being built, and each one stays marked as in development until there is evidence for it.
| Capability | What it is for | Public status |
|---|---|---|
| Versioned source records | Keep each source version, its date, and where excerpts came from. | In development |
| Entity resolution | Recognize when different sources refer to the same system, organization, or document. | In development |
| Claims with supporting and conflicting evidence | Link each claim to the exact passages that support it or cut against it. | In development |
| Time-aware relationships | Show when a relationship was stated, observed, or replaced. | In development |
| Permission-aware retrieval | Check access before retrieving, expanding, or exporting evidence. | In development |
| Investigations and briefs | Collect a question, its evidence, and its open items into a reviewable brief. | In development |
A capability is shown as available only when there is dated test evidence for it and an owner release approval. Passing tests do not change this table on their own.
Limits, stated plainly
- A citation shows that a source says something. It does not prove the statement is true.
- Extractions and interpretations are labeled separately from what a source states.
- CliqueMap is not a security certification, an audit opinion, or a guarantee of truth.
- No accuracy or performance figures are published, because no benchmark has been run.
Your information
- The public example uses only fictional, hand-written data. It does not upload files or browse URLs.
- Inquiries go to Assertion Labs and are used to reply to you. See the privacy notice.
- Optional analytics help us understand visits and improve the site. You control this in Analytics preferences.
Start with one investigation
A pilot is one scoped question over a corpus you are permitted to share. It ends with a brief and a list of its limitations. Architecture, security, and diligence advice from Assertion Labs is available on its own, separate from the software.